Resource selection is a critical part of an educational leader's
role in education today, at least in my opinion. Many school
districts and states are pushing to actively increase the amount of
technology integration, especially in one-to-one technology, to meet
the need of students to be exposed to technology in order to promote
learning. Many schools are implementing one-to-one initiatives or
have initiated one-to-one technology in order to meet the goals of
21st century learning. For instance, the Nebraska
Department of Education mentions on its website school districts to
use for reference and resources to make the one-to-one transition
more effective.
http://www.education.ne.gov/neat/laptopinitiatives.html.
With this trend increasing rapidly, how do schools truly make the
decision on what is the best type of resources to be selected for use
in schools?
There were two articles that I found to be highly effective in
describing the processes in selecting resources and ascertaining the
funds to increase the amount of resources in a school: “Leveraging
Title I & Title IID: Maximizing the Impact of Technology in
Education” and “Choosing the Perfect Tools for One-to-One.”
Through the process of reviewing these two articles, I
determined a couple of critical aspects that I believe I focused on
two key questions for my own personal.
First, what does our school need to make our students the most
successful twenty-first century learners possible? Change in
education is almost as frequent as a changing weather pattern. There
will be a dominant trend that will maintain a long pattern, but it
will ultimately give way to a new dominant trend. However, I believe
technology is not a trend, but a definite mainstay in education for
the foreseeable future. I find the most perplexing concept for an
educational leadership team to do their due diligence to ensure the
resources are selected in a manner that promotes the learning,
advancement, and support for years to come.
Secondly, I think educational leaders must question what is
realistic for our school. Do we have the resources to support the
continued development of the current technology? Are the
technological resources we are choosing going to be sustainable? I
found our school to be on the unfortunate negative side of this with
our one-to-one technology initiative, and we are currently in the
process of playing a bit of catchup. An example of this is a sixteen
gigabyte iPad. Whereas that might seem like a significant amount of
memory, trust the opinion of someone who is not a selfie-maniac,
sixteen gigabytes fills up quickly. Many staff members and students
have quickly maxed out memory on their iPads, and what is next? Buy
a new iPad after a year? In some instances, this has happened. I do
not question the given advice for recommended iPad capacity, however,
it is still a problem that had to be addressed quickly, and it is
being addressed quickly.
Desirable resources will inevitably change as twenty-first century
goals change and technology continues to evolve. A new group of
students with much different needs will enter in the school with a
much different set of needs than recent graduates. Maybe this will
be a cyclical pattern as well. One trend I see happening in the
future that inevitable, students in a decade will be much more
technologically savvy than current students. I believe my twenty
month old son that is able navigate an iPad is a prime example of how
advanced future generations of students will be from a technology
standpoint. Preparation, planning, and research will help me to feel
comfortable when making decisions on resource selection. I do
believe I will have a slice of humble pie and a good bit of
reflection in the future on decisions of resource selection.
Jason,
ReplyDeleteYou raise a very solid point. As educators we are so quick to jump on the latest trend bandwagon that we neglect to think about the long term ramifications. My school is site for the Focus program and all the students have an iPad but the district do not purchase the correct insurance and needless to say lost thousands in replacing broken or damaged iPads.
Jason-
ReplyDeleteI loved your last few lines but would suggest the order should change to research, planning and implementation. Thinking both for the long and short term needs of the school is a difficult task, but definitely what an administrator needs to do.